{reviewid: 882891, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
31st January 2006:
That was...there's no way to describe it, but it was GOOD!
Author's Response: "Good" is a good enough description for me! Thanks!
 Report Review |
{reviewid: 836318, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
1st January 2006:
Awesome banner!! Thank god you back up your stories! Unlike me :P.
Author's Response: Basically, I write them on Microsoft Word, save it, and post it. So, if something like what happened a while ago happens, I can just go back and re-post them.
Report Review |
{reviewid: 814670, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
17th December 2005:
That was really, really, really, really, really cute...
Author's Response: Thank you very, very, very, very, very much...^_^
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804635, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
hmmmmmmm......................................... not bad, not bad at all. Pretty darn (this is the first time I've ever used the word "darn"... I fell like I'm from Kansas or something...) good. I dunno, maybe you should have Fred and George, only they'll be like mental patients who escaped from pee holes in their solitary confinement cells (remarkably similair to how I escaped from the Psycho Ward...). Hmm... Psychos in Love... *shuffles off to plot ideas for a new fanfic*
Author's Response: Interesting. Mental patients, ..... i see potential. What do you think #1
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804581, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
Umm... odd, confusing but... odd. And now *drumroll* for my educated review: cool.
Author's Response: Umm…odd, confusing but…odd. And thank you
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804508, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
coughtoomuchtimeontheirhandscough
Author's Response: HPsmartone32: and apparently you did =)
Author's Response: we never have time on our hands...time is abstract we couln't have it on our hands
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804507, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
coughtoomuchtimeontheirhandscough
Author's Response: HPsmartone32: LMAO! YOu can say that agin!
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804489, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
Interestingly grossly disgustingly nicely greatly weird...and that's a compliment from me...
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804479, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
Hehehehe....my favorite part is how Harry is even more dimwitted than he is in the books.
Author's Response: Oh yes. Harry the boy-who-lived-to=-be-almost-as-stupid-of-a-prat-and-as-Mary-Sue -as-Ginny-Pure-Blood-Princess-Perfect-Mary-Sue-Ginny-Weasley-who-is-president-of the harry potter fan c-----
will you get off your no depth in HP's character kick! We know all ready!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Hi this #2 making up for #1 meanness)
And I'm back. So anyway back to how Harry is not smart at all and lacks the ability to do anything right except for feel sorry for himself and cause others to want to hit himself with random pillows that of course show up whenever needed. Also ginny....now ginny is that not a most mary sue character if I ever saw one! STUPID GINNY AND HARRY MY TWO LEAST FAVORITE CHARACTERS OF HP!!
Wrap it up already!
kk...glad you liked.
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804475, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
Wow, I agree with the other asphodel...I wasn't expecting something this crazy, and I have Great Expectations. (That was a REALLY boring book, wasn't it?)
Author's Response: AHHHHHHHHH NOW THERE'S THREE OF YOU STALKING US!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Review |
{reviewid: 804287, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
10th December 2005:
Um.. wow. Randomness cubed. Like it though, funny, and I betcha Austin came up with most of it, didn't he?
Author's Response: Do I know you? Oh no, are you a creepy stalker dude? AHHHHHHHHh *runs for life* And who's Austin? He's your accomplice huh? Now there's TWO OF YOU!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!! Love #1 and #2 (together for new year's eve...not like that you sicko)
Report Review |
{reviewid: 799377, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
6th December 2005:
That's SSSSOOOOO funny!
Report Review |
{reviewid: 797839, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
5th December 2005:
Aaawwww...
Author's Response: I'll take that as a good thing? ^.~ Haha
Report Review |
{reviewid: 797834, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
5th December 2005:
That was so sweet...
Author's Response: Thanks, I'm glad you thought so! ^_^
Report Review |
{reviewid: 797833, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
5th December 2005:
That was so sweet...
Author's Response: Thanks, glad you thought so! ^>^
Report Review |
{reviewid: 794239, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
3rd December 2005:
Um...were we supposed to understand that?
Author's Response: It was just sort of a drabble from the inside of Ron's mind. Everyone else has been able to understand it. Sorry. Thanks for the review though.
:hearts: Tonya
Report Review |
{reviewid: 794223, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
3rd December 2005:
Nice...very nice.
Report Review |
{reviewid: 794207, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
3rd December 2005:
Wow. That totally describes Ron...so stupid in the muggle world...love how Charlie "works" with dogs.
Author's Response: thanks!! that one took a little bit to come up with.
Report Review |
{reviewid: 792047, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
1st December 2005:
Interesting...very interesting...I HATE CLIFFHANGERS!
Report Review |
{reviewid: 762635, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
8th November 2005:
Hey, out of curiosity, why did admin "forbid" you from posting the WNC?
Author's Response: The gist of it apparently isn't allowed...
Report Review |
{reviewid: 759725, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
5th November 2005:
Thaank GOD you got your account back up! You are really good at humor.
Author's Response: Yeah...gotta be more careful in the future, though...
Report Review |
{reviewid: 752077, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
29th October 2005:
Isn't MacGonnagall headmistress now?
Author's Response: yep
Report Review |
{reviewid: 726770, reviewer: 'Asphodel'}
9th October 2005:
Welcome to the reviews! I answer all reviews so please R & R! Constructive criticism helps too!
-Asphodel
Author's Response: Err... ignore above review, I don't know what I was thinking, but that was the only way to get an introduction on the page, and then I found out that is against rules for the site to review yourself, plus it's not at the top of the page anymore.
Report Review |
