Report a Review

This service is designed to allow HPFF users to alert the staff about inappropriate reviews.

Review:academica says:
BAWW. Baby Weasleys. Cutest chapter to date ♥

If I might have a soft spot for Percy, I definitely have one for George. I always felt like Fred took up a bit more energy than he did, somehow, and it's nice to see him get the spotlight for once (may Fred rest in peace, though, of course). I love how makeshift his play was - having a cat as a damsel in distress and Ron as the terrifying villain? (It's really too bad there was no dragon. I think Budgy would have been an excellent fit for the role.)

The dialogue here was fantastic again, especially the way little Ron communicated with George, and I felt like the characterization of Molly and Arthur shone here, too. The Weasleys really would crumble without Molly, what with her cooking and storytelling and incessant fretting. I always like to see her get the appreciation she deserves :)


Author's Response: The idea for this story came out of literal nowhere -- I was actually sitting around thinking about how I had no ideas for this, and this one kind of just... appeared. :D

I agree with a lot of your views on George; I think that he is the gentler of the twins, and it's so interesting, because a lot of people seem to have garnered that impression, even with very little ACTUAL canon evidence. I wonder if that's a subconscious thing? I'm glad you liked his little story. :3 I'd always play-act when I was little, so it was fun writing about it here!

Oh, Molly's the absolute backbone in this family. :D I never had much opinion about her character until I started writing about it, but she's so strong, you know? It takes a lot of moral fiber to be mother to those kids, and she's so good at it, too. I'm really glad you're enjoying her characterization here!

Oh, goodness, I do not deserve all these reviews from you. ♥ Thank you so, so much, Amanda! I can't wait to hear your opinion on further chapters, too!!

Your Name:
Reason for this Report:

  • The review is offensive.
  • The review is spam or chit-chat (not actually a review).
  • The review was double posted.
  • The review has formatting problems.
Repeat the number: 207
Submit Report: